Interestingly this also exposes a bug with the WordPress Twitter embed on this theme which presumably isn’t designed to account for 240 characters and so screws up the formatting once it loads the actual content from Twitter. Oops.

.



I’ve just completed my first ADFS 4.0 implementation and I’m quite astonished at just how many stupid, petty and easily resolved bugs it suffers from.

Case in point, if you change the service certificate it doesn’t change the https certificate bindings. This means that even though your ADFS server is using your new certificate for its communications, the web service is still using the old one. It’s not IIS any more so you have to manually recreate the bindings via netsh.

There also seems to be a bizzare issue that only affects IE whereby if your ADFS farm name DNS record is a CNAME rather than an A record, any authentication attempts will fail with a 400 BAD REQUEST error. This doesn’t affect other browsers because why would it, it’s a fucking mental thing to do.



As per http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2921141, you cannot install the Exchange 2013 management tools onto a machine running Terminal Services. It’s unclear why.

Sure, it’s not as important as it used to be, what with the EAC now being a web interface, but it does mean you can’t easily install the Powershell modules and have to rely on Powershell Remoting which works fine but is much more of a pain in the arse to set up.



Update: Fixed it for a while, then it broke again. Come to the conclusion that the Windows 7 Task Scheduler is just irreparably broken as I’ve had this happen time and time again. Some 3rd party application is interacting with it in a way that reliably breaks it and I’ve never been able to narrow it down.

Yes, this one again.

When you open up the Task Scheduler, you get a message that says:
“The selected task “{0}” no longer exists. To see the current tasks, click Refresh.”

And you can’t view half your tasks any more, though if you run a SCHTASKS /Query /FO LIST you’ll see that they’re all still there and seem to be working.

I’ve toyed around with a lot of different solutions for this, but I’ve finally found one that fixed it for me:

Go to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Tracing\SCM\Regular and set or add REG_DWORD TracingDisabled to 0 and then reboot.

My only concern is that this may be generating a trace log somewhere, but I’ve been unable to find anything that suggests this is the case so far.



So today I discovered that the LastLogonTimestamp attribute of an account in AD (also known as LLTS) is only updated on logon if the old value is more than 14 days in the past. That means the value can only be trusted if it is more than 14 days in the past.

This, as it turns out, is very annoying if you’re trying to do some semi-half-assed auditing. Now, you can use the LastLogon attribute, which is always up to date, but that isn’t replicated between DCs so you have to query all of them.

Note to my future self: Do not rely on LLTS for anything more recent than 14 days.



Situation
You’re using PrintBRM.exe to migrate printers between servers (or to backup and later restore them on the same server) but when it tries to restore the print queues it fails with “Failed to restore print queue <Printer name>. Error 0x800706d9”

Cause
PrintBRM tries to query the Windows Firewall when it creates the shares for the print queues. If the Windows Firewall service is disabled, this step fails and the print queue is not created.

Solution
Start the Windows Firewall service (and make sure you either have physical access to the box, iLO/DRAC access, have already configured the firewall not to protect your network interfaces by default or have put an exception in for inbound RDP traffic, otherwise starting the service will lock you out of the box) and run the PrintBRM restore again.



I ran into an issue this morning with a pair of Windows 2003 Server DCs that were set to sync their clocks using NT5DS (which is the default and means they should sync from the domain hierarchy, which for DCs is often the PDC emulator). They kept logging the following error in the System Log:

The time provider NtpClient was unable to find a domain controller to use as a time source. NtpClient will try again in 15 minutes.

After much prodding, swearing and Googling, it became apparent that with 2003 if a DC has ever held the PDC Emulator role then it will still think it is the authoritative time source for the domain when that role is moved off it. This meant that we had 3 DCs all thinking that they were the One True Time Source and all being out of sync with each other by 2 or 3 minutes.

This issue can be resolved by running the following command on the former PDC Emulator(s): w32tm /config /syncfromflags:domhier /reliable:no /update which will tell the DC that it is no longer a reliable time source and so it should check for updates from a source that is (i.e. the PDC). You can speed things up a bit by issuing a w32tm /resync command to force the Windows Time service to update.

You can use w32tm /stripchart /computer:<PDC Name> to see in real-time how the local clock differs from the time on the PDC Emulator (The o: value) as the time service attempts to bring it back into sync.



You may remember my post a while back about issues with applying Exchange 2010 SP1 in situations where you were using Group Policy to control Powershell Execution policies. Specifically, this issue occurs because the Group Policy setting uses the WMI service to enforce the Execution Policy and as part of the Exchange install/upgrade process, the WMI service is stopped, causing the Execution Policy to revert to Restricted and the following error to pop up and the install to fail:

The following error was generated when "$error.Clear();
& $RoleBinPath\ServiceControl.ps1 EnableServices Critical
" was run: "AuthorizationManager check failed.".

Well it turns out that this still applies with Exchange 2010 SP2 in exactly the same fashion.

The (well, A) relevant KB article is here but the “workaround” is a bit half-assed to be honest and you’re much better off just disabling the associated Group Policy setting and configuring the Execution Policy locally (with set-executionpolicy) to either AllSigned,RemoteSigned or Unrestricted for the duration of the upgrade.

Why Microsoft cannot add installer logic to check for this possibility, especially given how long it’s been a potential problem, is beyond me but then I’m not an Exchange developer.



Update: There is a hotfix now available to address this issue, though you have to ring MS support directly to get hold of it at the moment. The plan is to roll it into an IE9 update in the near future. More details can be found here

There is a known issue with the Exchange 2007 and Exchange 2010 Management Consoles on machines with Internet Explorer 9 installed. This issue causes you to recieve the error: “You must close all dialog boxes before you can close Exchange Management Console.” when trying to close the EMC even though there aren’t any dialog boxes open.

As it stands, there are several workarounds: You can uninstall IE9, you can kill the MMC process from task manager every time and a few people have reported success with turning off “Internet Explorer Enhanced Security Configuration” for Administrators and Users (Servers only) and then adding https://localhost to the “trusted sites” in IE.

According to the Senior Program Manager for Internet Explorer Product Quality, Mark Feetham:

[…]we do now understand what’s occuring between the EMC, MMC and MSHTML. We have enough information to complete the investigation and have moved to looking at ways to improve this situation.

Rumoured ETA for a fix is Q4 2011.



A commonly reported issue with NSClient++ is seeing the following error when trying to install the service or run the client:

“The image file c:\[Path]\nsclient++.exe is valid, but is for a machine type other than the current machine”

The cause of this issue is attempting to run the incorrect version of the client for your architecture i.e. Trying to run the 64-bit version on a 32-bit operating system. The solution, obviously, is to run the correct version.